Epic adventure Sharks of the Corn breakdown. (Decker Shado)

Wiki Article

Are you ready to take an adrenaline-pumping ride through shark-infested cornfields? Put on your seat, because "Sharks of the Corn" will provide you with an exciting mix of horror and comedy. Written by legendary Tim Ritter, this ultra budget film draws inspiration from Stephen King's classic "Children of the Corn" (1984) and turns it into a hilarious and bizarre humor satire that'll leave you in a state of confusion as well as rolling around and laughing.

One of the most exciting Cornfield Carnival of Chaos

From the beginning of what appears to be a normal-looking cornfield "Sharks of the Corn" establishes its quirky nature. The film introduces Gary and Susan Two characters that are quickly pushed aside with the film taking off into unexpected direction. It weaves together horror elements, with a myriad of subplots. It's a pleasing blend that can be described as a cornfield fair of chaos.

An Phobiacally ill-tempered Shark Enthusiast

Enter Teddy Bo Lucas, a character who brings an additional dimension of absurdity to an amazing storyline. This crazy shark enthusiast has an uncanny love affair with these underwater predators. Like if the idea of sharks living in fields weren't interesting enough, Teddy increases his interest to an entirely new level when there's a shocking crime inside the room of his motel. The shocking twist set the scene for a storm in intrigue and skepticism.

There is confusion. Cults as well as Sharks

The plot becomes more intricate as authorities ascribe the blame to poor Gary for Susan's murder, regardless of his motive. The cult of sharks comes to light as an interesting subplot. It introduces us a world where cornfields and reverence for sharks clash. Just as you think the world isn't getting any wilder 2 bumbling thieves decide to take a shark pup from this clan. The show is a mix of comic and slapstick that will keep one on edge.

Critiques and Comic Relief

Although "Sharks of the Corn" gives viewers a fresh and different adventure, it's not without its shortcomings. It often jumps (blog post) between several characters and scenes leading some viewers to feel confused and trying to figure out its multiple plots. It's a clever stylistic decision that enhances the spoof aspect of the film however, it might not be the ideal choice for everyone.

The production quality of the movie are consciously low and the acting falls into the realm of questionable. But, in the midst of bad performances Steve Guynn shines through with his remarkable performance. His acting is exemplary, realizing his character instead of simply reciting dialogue. It's a rare piece of acting that is authentic in a sea of overblown performances.

Shark Puppets and Bonkers Plotlines

"Sharks of the Corn" showcases its low-budget appeal with unpretentious effects that hold a certain charm. It is notable that the majority of shark attack scenes have a hilarious re-creation using hand puppets. The effect adds the illusion of a certain absurdity the film. The absurd plot, that revolves about a plan of a shark's cult to revive a goddess of sharks in the middle, is where the film can truly show its creativity. This creativity, however, often isn't translated into an entertaining movie experience.

Amateurish Cinematography, Explosions Optional

One area where "Sharks of the Corn" fails is the cinematography. The visuals and framing come in a tinier way, lacking Sharks of the Corn video the finesse and polish found in popular horror films. While it's possible that this was done in keeping the look of low-budget films this does affect the performance of the entire experience.

To conclude "Sharks of the Corn" has a more mellow taste. It's uninspiring, slow hodgepodge of scenes that can be difficult to understand of. The film's low production values in addition to the confusing plotlines and insecure acting can turn off those who want a more elegant horror comedy. For those who are interested in terrible films to entertain "Sharks of the Corn" will not provide the anticipated hilarity.

Final Rating Final Rating: One "Stock Footage Overlay" Out of Five

Its low-quality footage, voice acting, as well as editing "Sharks of the Corn" will not be able to meet the mark. Though it's an excellent and fantastically fun spoof film it fails to provide an engaging and cohesive experience. The reviewer will concluding with a humorous comment: films, like corn, only get better when they include explosions. However, "Sharks of the Corn" will not make the cut.

Report this wiki page